![]() Table 2 Non-Clinical Normative Sample page 57. Onset dates of signs and symptoms of dysphagia warranting a physician's order for an examination to be completed by a licensed SLP ranged from April 2013 through March 2014. The demographic and diagnostic data for each of the 85 patients between the ages of 21 and 99 years who were assigned a neurological and/or respiratory diagnosis whose countries of origin included the United States and Mexico is reflected in Table 1. The clinical sample and non-clinical normative sample results are differentiated according to color. Graph Plots page 31-34 The data sets for the Communication-Cognition, Oral-Mechanism Function Evaluation, Bedside Evaluation subtests and the Total Dysphagia/Dysarthria Degree of Severity is visually depicted on each of the respective graph plots. The data collected was used to generate a raw score mean for all three of the subtests and was converted to a standard score of 100, standard deviation of 15, with a respective 50th percentile for the clinical sample of 85 participants and non-clinical normative sample of 60 participants. Total Dysphagia/Dysarthria Degree of Severity Data Set page 50. The data collected was used to generate a raw score mean for the Bedside Evaluation subtest and was converted to a standard score of 100, standard deviation of 15, with a respective 50th percentile for the clinical sample of 85 participants and non-clinical normative sample of 60 participants. The data collected was used to generate a raw score mean for the Oral-Mechanism Function Evaluation subtest and was converted to a standard score of 100, standard deviation of 15, with a respective 50th percentile for the clinical sample of 85 participants and non-clinical normative sample of 60 participants.īedside Evaluation Data Set page 45. Oral-Mechanism Function Evaluation Data Set page 40. The data collected was used to generate a raw score mean for the Communication-Cognition Evaluation subtest and was converted to a standard score of 100, standard deviation of 15, with a respective 50th percentile for the clinical sample of 85 participants and non-clinical normative sample of 60 participants. Communication-Cognition Evaluation Data Set page 35. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |